[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16651415#comment-16651415
 ] 

Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-652:
------------------------------------

FYI, DataNucleus also now supports methods on geospatial types.

http://www.datanucleus.org:15080/products/accessplatform_5_2/jdo/query.html#jdoql_typed_methods_geospatial

though this requires use of the DN-provided "javax.jdo.jar" rather than Apache 
JDO "jdo-api.jar".

Whether support for these types (and the associated query methods) can one day 
be standardised is left to people to request/discuss. The OGC standardised 
simple geospatial types a long time ago, as per 
[http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sfa] and DataNucleus has had full 
support for them since day one. These JDOQLTypedQuery expressions map directly 
on to the types they define.

> Provision of a typesafe refactor-friendly query capability for JDOQL
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-652
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: api, specification, tck
>            Reporter: Andy Jefferson
>            Assignee: Michael Bouschen
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: JDO 3.2
>
>         Attachments: JDO-652-api-ifTheElse.txt, JDO-652-api-patch-Andy.txt, 
> JDO-652-patch4.txt, typesafe.patch, typesafe_manifest.patch
>
>
> There are various querying capabilities of this type around. JPA2 has its 
> Criteria query API. Third party solutions like QueryDSL also exist, in its 
> case providing a JDOQL implementation (as well as JPQL, and HQL). We should 
> seriously consider introducing something along these lines in the JDO2.4 
> timeframe. 
> There is a comparison of JPA Criteria with QueryDSL over at 
> http://source.mysema.com/forum/mvnforum/viewthread_thread,49



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to