Hi Jerome,

I'm having difficulty making any sense out of your posting.  What you
have there is not a rule -- the construct is not formed correctly and
it's missing a right-hand side.  On top of that, none of the
"patterns" in your rule use the same fact heads in your assertions. 
Finally, asserting an ordered fact with that many items in its
multislot is bound to be far less flexible (and readable) than using
unordered facts.

I hate to be a stickler for detail, but if you would be more exact in
your problem description and clarify your code samples, it would help
greatly.

Cheers,
Jason Morris
Co-Moderator Jess Listserver / Wiki


--------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to