I should state, the work was the result of several years of research by Said Tabet and myself. To answer your question, both said and I are listed as the inventors.
peter On Feb 20, 2008 10:25 AM, Mohd. Noor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks > Peter, do you still holding the patent? :) > > Cheers > mnoor > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > that's one of the performance limitations with full fact replication > > approach for distributed pattern matching. In a situation where a > > significant percent of the facts always change, the most optimal method is > > to replicate just the indexes. Most modern RETE implementation like JESS > > already index the facts, so index replication allows the system to perform > > index joins without the fact. It's similar to how databases do index joins > > for partitioned tables. > > > > I should state that I filed a patent for distributed RETE using index > > replication back in 2004. As far as I know, that should be the most > > efficient method of implementing distributed RETE and distributed reasoning. > > > > peter > > > > > > On Feb 20, 2008 9:12 AM, Mohd. Noor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > In the DJESS - how often the working memory/fact/repository has to be > > > replicated? > > > How about if my the information that I am going to fire is always > > > change- so this is means that my distributed information are also need to > > > change. > > > > > > Rgds > > > mnoor > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
