This task only copies the classes. It doesnt attempt to copy the webapp or any jarfiles. Its useful for me during dev. I prefer ant tasks that are short and simple to remember. Thats why I chose 'deploy'. Names like 'install_all' and 'install_classes' get too long for my taste (imo)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jetspeed Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:17 AM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-jetspeed/build build.xml > Their already is a "install" task that copies classes and jars to the > webserver. Is their a reason to have both the "install" and "deploy" > tasks? If so, then pick similar names, i.e. "install_all" and > "install_classes" > > What about "install_war"? > > Paul Spencer > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > taylor 01/11/19 20:52:32 > > > > Modified: build build.xml > > Log: > > - added deploy task that simply 'hot deploys' the class files to the webapp directory of your webserver. > > this is useful during development. This task will not copy the 'webapp' files such as psml, templates. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.107 +16 -0 jakarta-jetspeed/build/build.xml > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
