> No, they aren't related at all. It looks like usrquota gets cleared on > any remount. It's not limited to jfs either. I see the same thing on > ext4. I don't know if this is a known behavior or not. You can > probably guess that I don't use quotas very much.
Hm, I'm also pretty sure I tried -o remount,usrquota,integrity but it didn't work... (can't remember exactly what happened, I'll try to retest it somewhere) > Misleading really. The kernel doesn't really do anything with the quota > flags. The quota tools use the presence of the flags to know when to > enable or disable quotas. I copied the man-page text from ext2/3 a long > time ago. So if I enforce quota on partition without usrquota flag (which has integrity flag) quota should work here? >> I'm pretty sure I did a "mount -o remount,usrquota" on another machine >> some time before and it didn't crash, however it also added nointegrity >> flag along with usrquota. > > nointegrity is generally not a good idea. I know, that's why I'm trying to have both usrquota + integrity, but apparently they don't play along - when I set usrquota it also sets nointegrity along with it :( > Not really. I can try stressing the file system and issuing remounts to > see if I can recreate anything like it. Thanks, I'll try to test some things, but it's a bit annoying, since this particular server is on colocation quite far away :/ -- Miha ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list Jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
