I'm so ashamed. If I attentively read man, I can see, that I may end information with -v parametr. I can save the time. So: I run fsck on test partiton [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# jfs_fsck -fv /dev/hdg6 jfs_fsck version 1.1.7, 22-Jul-2004 processing started: 9/17/2004 22.47.48 The current device is: /dev/hdg6 Open(...READ/WRITE EXCLUSIVE...) returned rc = 0 Primary superblock is valid. The type of file system for the device is JFS. Block size in bytes: 4096 Filesystem size in blocks: 29304560 **Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log LOGREDO: Log already redone! logredo returned rc = 0 **Phase 1 - Check Blocks, Files/Directories, and Directory Entries File system object MF1 has invalid descriptor (C). Filesystem is clean. All observed inconsistencies have been repaired. Filesystem has been marked clean. **** Filesystem was modified. **** processing terminated: 9/17/2004 22:47:49 with return code: 0 exit code: 8.
> On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 03:09, Petr Humlicek wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# jfs_fsck -f /dev/hdg6 > > jfs_fsck version 1.1.7, 22-Jul-2004 > > processing started: 9/15/2004 22.35.23 > > The current device is: /dev/hdg6 > > Block size in bytes: 4096 > > Filesystem size in blocks: 29304560 > > **Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log > > **Phase 1 - Check Blocks, Files/Directories, and Directory Entries > > Filesystem is clean. > > jfs_fsck is acting funny. It seems to be aborting somewhere in Phase 1 > without an error. This isn't supposed to happen. Normally, fsck > continues on to phases 2-8. > > Can you run jfs_fsck -fv against the partition? This may tell us > something. If not, I may have to send you a debug patch to try and > determine where fsck is bailing out. > > > Ok, have I any chance to save data, or I may format disc, and thing > > about RAID, or another way for safe backup? > > I think we still have a chance to save it, if I can figure out what's > broken in fsck. > _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion