Yes, that's the intent.
- Dennis
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
Where would this <split> element go? Whereever you can put a <structure> or <value>? It sounds good anyway.
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
One of the enhancements I'm planning for beta 4 is a way to split a binding definition into separate input and output variations at the component level. This is something that I've wanted several times. I'm not sure about the binding representation of this, but perhaps something along the following lines:
<split> <input> <collection add-method="...">...</collection> </input> <output> <collection field="...">...</collection> </output> </split>
using a collection example, where during unmarshalling I want items added using an add-method on the containing object, while for marshalling I'd rather just use the collection directly.
Any comments or suggestions?
- Dennis
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
