> > Now, with the binding, I have already try a lot of combinations using > "extends", "abstract", and others (even the "create-type" for the > Class A binding to create Class B instead)... but, when unmarshalling, > only one class is created with only and ONLY his particular atributes. > Here is the basic binding for each class (the real one is pretty much > larger, here i only use an example): > > > <mapping name="classA" class="mypackage.A" flexible="true" odered="false> > <value name="go" field="pepe"/> > <value name="two" field="lala"/> > </mapping> > > <mapping name="classB" class="mypackage.A" flexible="true" odered="false> > <value name="exam" field="name"/> > <value name="exampel" field="num" deserializer="myPackage.deserializeInt/> > </mapping> >
This is what worked for me: declare class A as abstract="true", B as extends="mypackage.A" and then in the mapping: <structure map-as="mypackage.A'/> It is a bit verbose, I admit, but it does the trick for now. Like you I expected the abstract and extends attributes to be sufficient. So maybe we should submit a jira issue for this. hth Kees ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
