This is the DTD I'm trying to accommodate
<!ELEMENT someNode ( (ABC | DEF | GHI | JKL | MNO | <----- There's about
twenty of these which represent pretty much the same object. No clue why
this was done, but I'm stuck with it. I wish I could just ignore but I need
to remember this value.
(cardNumber, expiryDate, cardHolderName,
(cvc | issueNumber | startDate)?,
xxxx?) |
(xxxx, xxxx?)
), xxxx?, xxxx?, xxxx? )>
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:44 AM, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I'm in the process of painfully taking one XML format
> and basically flatening it to have one main root node and all the elements
> under it.
>
> I have the following fragment....
>
>
> <parent-mc>
> <cardNumber>1234567890</cardNumber>
> </parent-mc>
>
> <parent-vi>
> <cardNumber>1234567890</cardNumber>
> </parent-vi>
>
>
>
> What this tells us is that the cardNumber is of type mc or of type vi
>
> The resulting model would
>
> <root>
> <type>credit card</type>
> <acctNumber>12354567890</acctNumber>
> </root>
>
> I suspect more unmarshaller stuff right? :P
>
> How would the binding for this look? I mean I know how to declare the
> unmarshaller based on your example. But how would I deal with declaring the
> different parent tags?
>
> I also realized that I need to keep parent-mc and parent-vi in a separate
> field so when I return back to the client I return back the right tag.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete
security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and
efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls
from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
