On Fri, 1 Jan 2016, Simon Legner wrote:

I tried to find some reference implementations for the RFC6555 / Happy
Eyeballs in Java – without success. None of the popular HTTP client
libraries [1, 2, 3] seem to have any support for this algorithm.
Instead, they seem to attempt connections sequentially to the resolved
addresses [4, 5].

Beside browsers nearly no software uses Happy Eyeballs as far as I know. Most software only does a single connect for a single IP. Some rotate the IP's, so each attempt tries another one. Some try one after another and so on.

All of these multi-connect mechanisms are workarounds. E.g. what do you do when you have a bad setup, where IPv6 connection is fine, but goes to the wrong destination. When do you decide that IPv4 must be used in this case.

That was a scenario I did see some often years ago with umanaged IPv6 setups and service moving to another server without changing also the IPv6 address.

Opening a TCP connection can become extremely complex when you want to care for all the possible misconfigurations.

We did not add multi-connect attempts for IPv4 only networks, why should we do it now? All IPv6 cases we had until now have been clearly broken connectivity. We can spend a lot of time to hide these errors, but what's the result? Will the users fix their setup? No.

I know these issues from 8 years ago when I started support for IPv6. Broken setups, providers not monitoring outages of IPv6, broken routes, ... It's 8 years later now! You can buy working IPv6 connectivity. I don't see such IPv6 specific errors anymore today. Hiding the errors which occur with other providers wont help in my eyes - only fixing them is right.

BTW the stats say: Google has 10% IPv6 now. We have about 2%. I'd say it works when I compare this to other HTTP based services which I run which are in the 0.x% range still.

Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)
_______________________________________________
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Reply via email to