So I'm trying this:
$j(function(){
bindEdit = function(){
$j('#edit').bind("click", function(){
var linkval = $j(this).attr("href");
$j('#jobinfo').load(linkval, function(){
bindEdit();
});
return false;
});
}
bindEdit();
});
Which to me says bind an onclick function to an a tag with ID 'edit'. Read
the value of it's href (pages are dynamically loaded an hrefs change). Load
the link into the div id "jobinfo" and now call bindEdit to bind the click
event to the edit link on the newly loaded page. Return false so it doesn't
follow the link as a normal link.
OK, so it doesn't work. The page loads normally instead of into the div via
ajax and I get "too much recursion" errors in the console.
Am I doing something wrong here?
On 4/17/07 9:57 AM, "spinnach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> .bind('click') is faster because you bind it directly to the element,
> .find() must first find the element inside the #jobinfo element and then
> bind the appropriate event..
>
> there is no difference between .bind('click') and .click(), .click is
> just an alias for .bind('click').. and if i'm not mistaken, .click was
> taken out of the core since 1.1 (i may be wrong, i know some aliases
> were removed, but not sure which - so i just use .bind for everything :))..
>
> dennis.
>
> Shelane Enos wrote:
>> What is the difference, advantage/disadvantage of these different methods:
>>
>> bindEdit = function(){
>> $j('#edit').bind("click", function(){
>> var linkval = $(this).attr("href");
>> $j('#jobinfo').load(linkval, function(){
>> bindEdit();
>> });
>> return false;
>> });
>> }
>>
>> bindEdit = function(){
>> $j('#jobinfo').find('#edit').click(function(){
>> var linkval = $(this).attr("href");
>> $j('#jobinfo').load(linkval, function(){
>> bindEdit();
>> });
>> return false;
>> });
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
