You should leave prototype in though...it's one of the main contenders. If anything, I'd take out 1.1.2.dev.
_____ From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin Sterling Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:49 PM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: follow up on real world speed test Rey, Taken care of. The version that was up there was $Date: 2007-04-28 11:33:25 -0400 (Sat, 28 Apr 2007) $ $Rev: 1809 $ There is an over all upgrade in speed, but there are somethings that are slower. (FF2) jQuery 1.1.3a jQuery 1.1.2dev MooTools 1.2dev ext 1.1b1 cssQuery 2.02 dojo query 931 1 044 264 436 1495 373 I took out prototype to make room for 1.1.3 It looked to get worse on these: div.news-body div.news-details a.tool (1.1.3) 8 ms | 45 found (1.1.2) 4 ms | 45 found .news-summary .news-body .news-details .tool (1.1.3) 137 ms | 60 found (1.1.2) 43 ms | 60 found but better on: .news-summary .news-body div.news-details a.tool (1.1.3) 27 ms | 45 found (1.1.2)129 ms | 45 found div.news-summary div.news-body div.news-details a.tool (1.1.3 ) 8 ms | 45 found (1.1.2)12 ms | 45 found Which version of jQuery did you use in the tests? If its v1.1.2 that came with the test suite, can you add v1.1.3 from SVN to see if there's any difference? There should be since the selector speed was improved in v1.1.3. -- Benjamin Sterling http://www.KenzoMedia.com http://www.KenzoHosting.com
