np, have fun.... since u said u were new, one more info is that... paul is creating a new plugin called jquery ui, which maybe a replacement for interface or a complement to interface... So, you might want to keep an eye out for that one,,,
-GTG On 7/4/07, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks!!!!! That's just what I was looking for.. I haven't used Interface before but it looks promising. On 5 Jul., 03:07, "Ganeshji Marwaha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/ifx.html#slide-fx > > try "slide out down" and "slide in down". > > -GTG > > On 7/4/07, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Ext has thishttp://extjs.com/deploy/ext/docs/output/Ext.Fx.htmlwhich > > is pretty much all one can ask for. > > John, I know jQuery support Ext but I would like to use jQuery for my > > current project. Ext is just too big and I don't want to build a new > > Ext download every time the clients wants more features, for that > > jQuery is perfect with its extensible architecture (and tiny tiny > > footprint). > > > On 5 Jul., 02:20, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Do you realize that you can do this now? There's already a .animate() > > > function, you don't need any of the 1.2 functionality for that. > > > > SlideDown: .animate({ height: 'show' }); > > > SlideUp: .animate({ height: 'hide }); > > > SlideRight: .animate({ width: 'show' }); > > > SlideLeft: .animate({ width: 'hide' }); > > > > --John > > > > On 7/4/07, Jon Ege Ronnenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all! > > > > > I like jQuery a lot and have used it in couple projects now. But one > > thing I > > > > really don't get is the "slideUp" and "slideDown" functions. Why can't > > I > > > > decide which way the animation goes?? I really think they (the > > functions) > > > > should be more generic. While browsing the road map for jQuery 1.2I > > saw the > > > > Relative Animations section which is exactly what I want. It would be > > > > obvious if slideUp/slideDown uses this new method but wouldn't be nice > > if > > > > there where a shorthand to achieve this? > > > > I propose slideUp/slideDown(string > > > > /number, string direction); where direction can be "up", "right", > > "down" or > > > > "left". > > > > For now I'll settle with animate and some CSS mumbo jumbo. > > > > > Anyway, thanks for your time - you took to read this :-)
