Naming conventions have always been my problem. What types of names do you (anyone) give these necessary parameters?
On 7/7/08 10:59 AM, "Mike Alsup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have set up a test page that shows this problem. It works in FF but not >> IE. >> >> http://education.llnl.gov/uploads/testup.lasso >> >> Mike, can you look into this. If you already have, do you have an estimate >> as to when this will be fixed? >> >> Thanks. > > I can't give you an estimate because the problem arises from a change > to core and not something I can fix in the plugin. However, if you > comment out line 203 of the uncompressed form plugin then things > should work fine. Line 203 contains the following code: > > method: 'POST', > > Note however that you need to ensure that the form's method attribute > is set to POST in the markup since the plugin will no longer catch > that for you. > > Also, I stand by my previous comment about using better input names. > I realize that "method" is a logical name for you, but using names > like method, action, type, nodeType, etc, etc is asking for trouble. > And this is a perfect example of why - your code used to work and now > it doesn't. Surely you can come up with names that make sense and > don't collide with DOM properties. > > Mike > >
