I had thought I had webrick working fairly well, but did not
see the fcntl problem. It is cool we can support non-blocking.
I can apply the patch (from your other thread) this evening
(I am out of town on an unexpected business trip).
-Tom
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Ola Bini defenestrated me:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that it would be great fun to support WEBrick completely, wouldn't
> it?
> I tried this small example, a daytime server:
>
> require 'webrick'
>
> s = WEBrick::GenericServer.new( :Port => 2000 )
> trap("INT"){ s.shutdown }
> s.start{|sock|
> sock.print(Time.now.to_s + "\r\n")
> }
>
> Alas, it actually works, but not completely. The big problem is that
> WEBrick uses fcntl to close the connection, (or at least that's what it
> looks like. I began by adding this to the empty fcntl.rb file:
> class Fcntl
> F_SETFL = 1
> O_RDWR = 2
> O_TRUNC = 512
> O_RDONLY = 0
> O_EXCL = 1024
> O_ACCMODE = 3
> O_NONBLOCK = 1
> O_CREAT = 256
> O_WRONLY = 1
> O_APPEND = 8
> end
>
>
> When this is there, we get a method missing error, because it seems our
> RubyIO doesn't have support for fcntl at all. Obviously this would be good
> to have, for certain operations. Any plans on looking at this soon, or is
> anyone already looking at it, or should I take a look on getting it
> working, at least for TCPSocket?
>
> Regards
> Ola Bini
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jruby-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
--
+ http://www.tc.umn.edu/~enebo +---- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----+
| Thomas E Enebo, Protagonist | "Luck favors the prepared |
| | mind." -Louis Pasteur |
_______________________________________________
Jruby-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
