Thanks Stefan. Here's the full URL for anyone interested:

http://www.sezession.de/wp-content/uploads/alte_nummern/sezession_heft22.pdf


Jd

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Stefan Jarl <stefj...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> It was some time I read Niekisch's text so I'll refrain from commenting for
> now. But I found it interesting, even though it gave me the impression that
> Niekisch's focus on politics made him unable to see what Jünger really was
> onto.
>
> And also: The essay in question was published in 2008 by the german journal
> Sezession and is availible online in their pdf-archive:
> http://www.sezession.de/ ("PDF-Download der alten Ausgaben" to the right).
>
> /Stefan
>
> 2010/1/4 Joel Dietz <jdi...@gmail.com>
>
>
>>
>> Was reviewing my notes on Eliot Neaman's Dubious Past  (P. 188-189), and
>> came across this:*
>>
>> In a two-page critique of the Waldgang, a copy of which Niekisch sent to
>> Juenger, the former editor of the national Bolshevist Widerstand compared
>> Juenger ot Max Stirner, whose individualism was nearly solipsistic. Acording
>> to Niekisch, Juenger doesn’t realize how indebted every individual is to the
>> collective: indeed, he remarks, “glorious isolation” is a version of
>> societal exploitation. Niekisch wonders why the figure of the Waldgaenger
>> has achieved such popularity among conservatives, positing that postwar
>> individualism is the last refuge o the European intellectual, threatened by
>> the mass culture of America nad the Stalinist Leviathan of Russia.*
>>
>> * *
>>
>> *Niekisch detects in all of Juenger’s poses the flight from society,
>> ”whether in Africa, as a heroic soldier, a gourmet of aesthetics, as a
>> runaway from Hitle’rs army in the dreamy reflection of Gardens and Streets,
>> as a mountain dweller in the cosmic sphere of Heliopolis. .. . wherever one
>> looks, one uncovers the figure of the fleeing nihilist.” Finally, Niekisch
>> asks, “where is the forest?” He considers the trees a natural metaphor for
>> solitude and refuge, comparable to Rousseau’s idea of nature. AS such the
>> forest “is the somber feeling, the intuitive sense of the inner self,
>> emancipated from the exterior world.” Niekisch concludes with the material
>> question, “who finances this freedom”*
>>
>> Curious how list members would respond to Niekisch's critiques.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Joel
>>
>>
>>
>  
>

Antwort per Email an