Dear Jugger's, Kalau untuk memakai Glassfish gimana ? perlu ada apache httpd webserver untuk melayani static content ? jika emmang tidak perlu httpd , kenapa gak pake aja glassfish ? .
Best Regards, Andi Kusnadi,Skom 0813 1883 92 37 programmer .net, java, streamezzo ________________________________ From: Daniel Baktiar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: jug-indonesia@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 1:26:58 PM Subject: Re: [JUG-Indonesia] mod_jk vs mod_proxy i have some disagreement. what thomas asserted might be true only when the application is html heavy application (not much binaries resources such as jpgs, flash, etc). my reasoning: first, most of deployment of tomcat in large scale is better shielded in reverse proxy web server. tomcat is *bad* when you it goes to caching big sized web resources, such as 15mb flash (it eats up your jvm heap, and native binaries web server could handle more loads efficiently) . if an application has a lot of static contents (such as flash binaries and jpg images), what an ugly way to deploy application in production with fat 200 (lbs, oops, mb) gorilla WAR. move the static content resources to other web server (e.g. apache httpd, iplanet, iis). second, reverse proxy web server would be able to shield tomcat from the load of connection that is not related to dynamic content, thus reducing actual connection to tomcat. for example when you have dynamic public content that is polled 10 seconds (such as announcements or tickers), having thousands of browser ajax client polling every 10 seconds might make your tomcat turned belly up. adding a reverse proxy web server in between, you could set the cache lifetime to 5 seconds, the request that is passed to tomcat will be only 2 times within that 10 seconds. third, the front layer web server when configured as reverse proxy could do the load balancing as well, and redirection of some server in maintenance to other server or even other than tomcat. note: better alternative to apache httpd mod_proxy: varnish On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Thomas Wiradikusuma <wiradikusuma@ gmail.com> wrote: you need to confirm this (ask google?), but i once read an article explaining that using tomcat alone serving everything (assuming you're heavy on java) is performant too. 2008/10/23 Ifnu bima <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com>: > Hi all, > > gw mau expose tomcat ke internet, kemudian depanya mau dipasangin apache. -- salam hangat, Thomas Wiradikusuma http://wiradikusuma .blogspot. com/2008/ 10/benci- mendengar- berita-kemiskina n.html <-- do you? -- Daniel Baktiar Senior JEE* Monkey -- willing to work hard in the Java beans brewery for a big bunch of bananas (http://dbaktiar. wordpress. com)
