as far as i can pinpoint it is the FillPattern loading algorithm. Renaming or deleting the folder with the pattern brings it up to a to 2513 comparable speed.
should we fix it or leave it to geoff? ..ede On 17.11.2011 17:57, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > i can repeat this with > R2513plus 20s, > R2532plus 60s > .. ede > > On 17.11.2011 17:54, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> Bernd a german user i am in contact with noticed that the current plus build >> takes much longer to start up. here are his measurements. >> >> Release min:sec >> R2532plus 02:12 >> R2532core ca. 00:05 >> >> R2513plus 00:45 >> r2513core ca. 00:05 >> >> for tests i made the 2513 available again. >> >> a short test here showed that sextante takes at least 30s alone (on my >> machine of course). >> >> ..ede >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
