Kresten Krab Thorup wrote: > So what I suggest is to have a new special kind of class loader > (TransientClassLoader maybe) which doesn't have the strong link to > classes loaded by it. If this was a new class, then no existing code > would be broken by it; and so the new semantics for when a class is > eligible for class unloading would only apply to classes loaded by > transient class loader (ad subclasses thereof).
This is *exactly* what I want. Unfortunately the only way to get it right now is to hack the JDK or create your own version that calls out to JNI to define the underlying class. But such an addition would be a trivial piece of code to add to JDK. - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
