Jochen Theodorou wrote: > Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:[...] >> Perhaps there's some confusion here. To me, an inline cache is a >> specific type of call site cache. I considered Groovy's call site cache >> to be an inline cache. What do you feel is the difference? > > nothing, just a mixup on my side... sorry for that. I somehow thought > JRuby would use a PIC, but now I realize that is not the case. > > Say, do you invalidate the caches from the outside? Because I always had > the feeling, this would be a bad idea. Too many references.
We do, and it seems to work fine. It took a bit of fiddling to get threading-related issues "mostly" safe without locks though. The number of references doesn't seem to be as big a deal as the number of CallSite objects, but for a typical app like Rails after warmup we're still only using 55-60MB of heap. Just a lot of small objects. - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
