On Thu, 8 May 2008, Nevo wrote: > > Well, I'm not an expert in this, but I don't know if this really would make > > any improvement. With hardware acceleration you "just" throw your bytecode > > at the CPU and it processes it just as if it were native code. So, I don't > > see how JIT could be useful here. Also, it is unlikely to make our work > > easier, or would it? I'd go as simple as possible to start with. > > > You mignt mean Jazelle like technology actually.
Yes, this is exactly what I mean by "hardware accelerated Java on AVR32" and what Atmel calls "Java Extension Module (JEM)." The main difference is, that JEM documentation is publically accessible, and Jazelle isn't. > > I'll let you know when the board arrives. > > > Thank you :) . Maybe I should find some emulator first :) I haven't found any. Let me know if you have more luck. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list kaffe@kaffe.org http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe