Am Dienstag, 10. Juli 2012 11:44:01 UTC+2 schrieb Dave King: > > Pleased to see someone taking an interest in porting Kamaelia to > Python 3. I wonder if you could comment on the possibility of having a > single Kamaelia codebase compatible with both Python 2.7 and 3.3. >
As Michael already mentioned, there's a problem with <2.7 and exception handling, which is already fixed in Axon - the fix could be employed in Kamaelia, too. The rest shouldn't be too problematic. Oh, there was one idiom somewhere, which probably won't work in <3.x.. I'll look into that, again. On 7 July 2012 22:30, Riot wrote: > > * There are a few unicode strings (for http responses and similar stuff) > > that will have to be treated slightly different (...and more sane/safe) > - i > > haven't really touched these, except removing the obsolete leading u" > > > > The unicode literal has returned in Python 3.3, this might help create > a single compatible codebase? > > See PEP414 - http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0414/ Okaay, after reading this and a quick check in #python, i'm going to switch my stuff and the Patch to 3.3 after a few tests. I don't think this will affect my code at all. They said, the u-literal was the last backward-compatible thing to be implemented, though. Thanks for the hint ;) riot -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kamaelia" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/kamaelia/-/DMd4iBVbvAYJ. To post to this group, send email to kamaelia@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to kamaelia+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/kamaelia?hl=en.
