On 7/21/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:03:00PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 7/21/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >I would much more prefer this functionality to be integrated into unifdef.
> > >There is no good reason to have two different preprocesisng methonds, one
> > >being the sed based one and the other the unidef one.
> > >
> > >A sinlge dedicated program that contian the sum of the functionality would
> > >be faster too.
> >
> > which functionality ?  normalizing of whitespace or all these
> > linux-specific hacks ?  unifdef serves one specific function which is
> > stated in its manpage: remove preprocessor conditionals from code.
> At present the kernel has a private copy of unidef. So adjusting the
> private copy for the needs of the kernels seems like a god plan.

didnt realize the kernel had integrated it since it didnt at first ...
so yeah, extending it however we see fit should be fine

This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
kbuild-devel mailing list

Reply via email to