Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 05:42:53PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote: > > > > [...] kbuild-2.5 does not replace something simple with > > something complex, instead it replaces something complex and broken with > > something of greater complexity and not broken. [...] > > About current kbuild being broken I'm a bit puzzled. The old scheme with > make dep (using mkdep) were indeed broken. But thats fixed now. > Separate SRC and OBJ trees are on the way. > > So whats left in current kbuild that is considered broken?
Keith has a file with a long list of kbuild bugs and design flaws, all of which he has fixed in kbuild-2.5. I don't know which of these Kai has addressed, but I'll bet lunch it's a long way short of all of them. > The statement that the builds are more accurate is no longer true. > kbuild tracks ALL dependencies and recompile if the command line changed > as well. > But please prove me wrong I may have overlooked something. I'll let Keith point out all the cases Kai hasn't handled. Greg. -- the price of civilisation today is a courageous willingness to prevail, with force, if necessary, against whatever vicious and uncomprehending enemies try to strike it down. - Roger Sandall, The Age, 28Sep2001. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
