Roman Zippel wrote: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>Some things made me go eww (but on the whole details): >> >> - I'd prefer the Config.in name, since this has nothing to do with >> building, and everything to do with configuration. > > > Fine with me. > (jgarzik, I think you're overruled now. :) )
Well, my basic preference is * something other than Config.new (the original name in your config system) * something other than Config.in I think it is a mistake to name a totally different format the same name as an older format... even "config.in" would be better than "Config.in"... ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
