On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:19:56PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > Because of that, i think, following is redundant: > > > > - to check for binary files > > find . -type f | xargs cleanfile
What about patches? Anyway, by agreement (with myself), i've stopped on having per-file-name division (prev. message first patch, and that was last design remaining from cleanfile/cleanpatch). So: for f in $* do clean-whitespace $f 2>&1 >/dev/null done But this doesn't look like interactive usage, which i've concluded. Plus copy is saved in $f.clean file, so user can `diff -u` to see any destruction and possibly report a bug. [] > > - scan whole file for long lines, with useless bunch of messages about > > ones. Useless, because script doesn't fix that, it can't do that! > > Still useful to let the human know what is going on, and why. What i've done was `cleanpatch patch-2.6.21-rc4-rc5` That's where usefulness comes from ;) > -hpa ____ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
