On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:16:27AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
>
> What do you think about this one? I want to propose to remove
> scripts/unifdef.c but to make clear policy about how to mark __KERNEL__
> sections in header files. We know how obfuscated C can be, and this also
> applies to preprocessing. There's known CodingStyle about some points.
> The thing is to specify rules, that will be easy for `sed` to do cleaup
> job.
>
> ./linux/soundcard.h:#if (!defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(KERNEL) &&
> !defined(INKERNEL)
> && !defined(_KERNEL)) || defined(USE_SEQ_MACROS)
> ./linux/stat.h:#if defined(__KERNEL__) || !defined(__GLIBC__) || (__GLIBC__ <
> 2)
>
> Split __KERNEL__ check, make only positive, i.e.
>
> #if defined(__KERNEL__)
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> ./linux/stat.h:#ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> No `#else` and ending part to contain comment:
>
> ./linux/smb_fs_sb.h:#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> Simple enough:
>
> sed '/^#if[^_]*__KERNEL__/,/^#end[^_]*__KERNEL__/d'
What are you trying to say with the above?
Sorry but I lost track of part of the discussion but you seems to havea point
here?
Sam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
