https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370195

            Bug ID: 370195
           Summary: Bug#839716: plasma-widgets: For easier bug reports
                    widgets should have an "About" Section containing the
                    package they belong to.
           Product: plasmashell
           Version: master
          Platform: Debian testing
                OS: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: wishlist
          Priority: NOR
         Component: general
          Assignee: k...@davidedmundson.co.uk
          Reporter: wettererschein...@bb-goettingen.de
                CC: bhus...@gmail.com, plasma-b...@kde.org

Link to Debian Wishlist-Bug which I hereby send upstream: 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839716
Thanks, Maria!

Package: plasma-widgets-workspace
Version: 4:4.11.13-2
Severity: wishlist
File: plasma-widgets

Dear Maintainer,

writing bug reports about bugs in Plasma widgets or addons is sometimes quite
difficult as it is not clear to which package they belong to.

Especially if you use a non-english language, you don't even know the official
name of the widget/addon, so it is really hard work to find out where to write
the bug report to. Even in the forums people sometimes can't help you,
especially if your used language is much different than english therefore using
completely different names.

Fazit: Widgets should have an "About" Section containing at least information
about the package they belong to. This would make reporting of bug alot easier.

Thanks for your work and time!
Maria



-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500,
'testing'), (100, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages plasma-widgets-workspace depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.24-3
ii  libkdecore5                   4:4.14.23-1
ii  libkdeui5                     4:4.14.23-1
ii  libkdewebkit5                 4:4.14.23-1
ii  libkio5                       4:4.14.23-1
ii  libkunitconversion4           4:4.14.23-1
ii  libplasma3                    4:4.14.23-1
ii  libplasmaclock4abi4           4:4.11.13-2
ii  libqt4-declarative            4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libqt4-network                4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libqt4-xml                    4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libqtcore4                    4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libqtgui4                     4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libqtwebkit4                  2.3.4.dfsg-8.1
ii  libstdc++6                    6.1.1-11
ii  libx11-6                      2:1.6.3-1
ii  libxcomposite1                1:0.4.4-1
ii  libxdamage1                   1:1.1.4-2+b1
ii  libxfixes3                    1:5.0.2-1
ii  libxrender1                   1:0.9.9-2
ii  plasma-dataengines-workspace  4:4.11.13-2

plasma-widgets-workspace recommends no packages.

plasma-widgets-workspace suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Maximiliano Curia wrote:

¡Hola Maria!

El 2016-10-04 a las 11:24 +0200, Maria escribió:
> Package: plasma-widgets-workspace Version: 4:4.11.13-2 Severity: wishlist 
> File: plasma-widgets

> Dear Maintainer,

> writing bug reports about bugs in Plasma widgets or addons is sometimes quite 
> difficult as it is not clear to which package they belong to.

> Especially if you use a non-english language, you don't even know the 
> official name of the widget/addon, so it is really hard work to find out 
> where to write the bug report to. Even in the forums people sometimes can't 
> help you, especially if your used language is much different than english 
> therefore using completely different names.

> Fazit: Widgets should have an "About" Section containing at least information 
> about the package they belong to. This would make reporting of bug alot 
> easier.

I don't see how this could be feasible under the Debian scope, but it shouldn't
be too hard to do this on the upstream side of things, reporting the
corresponding group (plasma, apps, extragear) and component (kdeplasma-addons,
etc) a particular plasmoid belongs to. The relation between the upstream
component names and the Debian source package names should be similar enough,
and are probably easy to find, although you'll need to know how to report to
the source package directly.

On the other hand, most kde applications have a Report Bug menu entry, that
reports the issue upstream, which is the preferred report method for the not
Debian specific issues, so it would make sense to add this "report bug" option
to the plasmoids.

Could you please send the feature request upstream?

Happy hacking,
-- 
"Fighting patents one by one will never eliminate the danger of software
patents, any more than swatting mosquitoes will eliminate malaria."
-- Richard M. Stallman
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/ 

Reproducible: Always

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to