On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 5:23 AM Thiago Macieira <thi...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Monday, 28 August 2023 12:59:01 PDT Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > (puts on FreeBSD hat) On the non-GNU side of the world, lldb is the thing > > that is "installed anyway" and gdb takes extra effort. Though I don't know > > if the lldb integration works -- I have both installed, and I don't know if > > I ever bother to interact with DrKonqi (sorry). > > True, but the majority of our user base is still Linux, so if we had to choose > only one, it would have to be gdb.
I am not quite following. We can depend on any debugger we want, surely? I mean, there are practical implications to consider for sure, but gdb being the dominant debugger on Linux doesn't prevent us from depending on lldb instead. HS
