On Sunday April 26 2020 20:16:33 René J.V. Bertin wrote: >I was referring to code that just rolls their own implementation of the code >in almost an given library. It's a bit of a pathological argument but I'd say >it's beyond argument that you can always do that, whereas even exhaustive >knowledge of all existing code that uses that particular library (and only >part of it) constitutes no proof that no code could every need all of it. >In fact, all one has to do to reject your hypothesis is write a single >application that contains an exhaustive set of unit tests of all of the >library's APIs. In fact, just unit tests of the ctors would do for most >libraries/frameworks.
Shall we just write this exchange off to the effects of lock-up and "social distancing"? :)
