On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 17:28:07 +0200 Pratyush Yadav <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Not sure why this code works - I'll suspend the series from linux-next > > for now. > > It only gets called in the error path and that didn't get hit during > testing I suppose. Until v3 the chunk was being allocated using > kzalloc() so I guess this got missed in the move to get_zeroed_page(). > > I think Mike is out of office this week. Do you think this series is > stable enough to land in the upcoming merge window? If so, I can send a > v6 with the fix today. A one-liner fiup would be preferred, if no other changes are required, thanks.
