On Thu,  6 Nov 2025 14:59:03 +0800 Pingfan Liu <[email protected]> wrote:

> The kexec segment index will be required to extract the corresponding
> information for that segment in kimage_map_segment(). Additionally,
> kexec_segment already holds the kexec relocation destination address and
> size. Therefore, the prototype of kimage_map_segment() can be changed.

Could we please have some reviewer input on thee two patches?

Thanks.

(Pingfan, please cc linux-kernel on patches - it's where people go to
find emails on lists which they aren't suscribed to)

(akpm goes off and subscribes to kexec@)

> Fixes: 07d24902977e ("kexec: enable CMA based contiguous allocation")
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: Baoquan He <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mimi Zohar <[email protected]>
> Cc: Roberto Sassu <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alexander Graf <[email protected]>
> Cc: Steven Chen <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> ---
>  include/linux/kexec.h              | 4 ++--
>  kernel/kexec_core.c                | 9 ++++++---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 4 +---
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index ff7e231b0485..8a22bc9b8c6c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ extern bool kexec_file_dbg_print;
>  #define kexec_dprintk(fmt, arg...) \
>          do { if (kexec_file_dbg_print) pr_info(fmt, ##arg); } while (0)
>  
> -extern void *kimage_map_segment(struct kimage *image, unsigned long addr, 
> unsigned long size);
> +extern void *kimage_map_segment(struct kimage *image, int idx);
>  extern void kimage_unmap_segment(void *buffer);
>  #else /* !CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
>  struct pt_regs;
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static inline void __crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
>  static inline void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
>  static inline int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
>  static inline int kexec_crash_loaded(void) { return 0; }
> -static inline void *kimage_map_segment(struct kimage *image, unsigned long 
> addr, unsigned long size)
> +static inline void *kimage_map_segment(struct kimage *image, int idx)
>  { return NULL; }
>  static inline void kimage_unmap_segment(void *buffer) { }
>  #define kexec_in_progress false
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> index fa00b239c5d9..9a1966207041 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> @@ -960,17 +960,20 @@ int kimage_load_segment(struct kimage *image, int idx)
>       return result;
>  }
>  
> -void *kimage_map_segment(struct kimage *image,
> -                      unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
> +void *kimage_map_segment(struct kimage *image, int idx)
>  {
> +     unsigned long addr, size, eaddr;
>       unsigned long src_page_addr, dest_page_addr = 0;
> -     unsigned long eaddr = addr + size;
>       kimage_entry_t *ptr, entry;
>       struct page **src_pages;
>       unsigned int npages;
>       void *vaddr = NULL;
>       int i;
>  
> +     addr = image->segment[idx].mem;
> +     size = image->segment[idx].memsz;
> +     eaddr = addr + size;
> +
>       /*
>        * Collect the source pages and map them in a contiguous VA range.
>        */
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c 
> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> index 7362f68f2d8b..5beb69edd12f 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> @@ -250,9 +250,7 @@ void ima_kexec_post_load(struct kimage *image)
>       if (!image->ima_buffer_addr)
>               return;
>  
> -     ima_kexec_buffer = kimage_map_segment(image,
> -                                           image->ima_buffer_addr,
> -                                           image->ima_buffer_size);
> +     ima_kexec_buffer = kimage_map_segment(image, image->ima_segment_index);
>       if (!ima_kexec_buffer) {
>               pr_err("Could not map measurements buffer.\n");
>               return;
> -- 
> 2.49.0

Reply via email to