* "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-26 11:00]: > > Making this depend on KEXEC would be most unfortunate. This is valuable > information for finding all kinds of issues even in the absence of KEXEC. > > I really don't see a point in making this configurable, except perhaps > under CONFIG_EMBEDDED.
Now we have all opinions about how making that interface configurable. Mikael, should an option under CONFIG_EMBEDDED be acceptable for you? Then I can repost the patch, Cc Greg KH and see if the sysfs structure would be ok for him. Bernhard -- Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
