Ken Raeburn wrote: > If I understand correctly, this won't prevent us from somewhere down > the line removing the private symbols that applications aren't > supposed to be using, but we export for the moment for the current > GSSAPI or Kerberos v4 implementations, right? > > Ken Not at all. In fact, we could mark the private symbols as NONAME and make them only accessible via the ordinal if we really wanted to make them private.
Of course, that would break third party apps that currently rely on their presence. Jeffrey Altman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ kfwdev mailing list kfwdev@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kfwdev
