Derek Atkins wrote:
> Jason Wessel <jason.wes...@windriver.com> writes:
>
>   
>>> I think that yes, it probably is compiled with CONFIG_SMP=y.  That never
>>> used to be a problem before.  Is it a problem now?  Strangely I used
>>> the same .config to manually build the 2.2.7 kgdb git snapshot I pulled
>>> down and that kernel seems to run correctly.
>>>       
>> In the kernels I have tested, it seems to boot fine with CONFIG_SMP on
>> or off.  The extended patch series does initialize the exception
>> handlers earlier than without the extended patch series.  It is possible
>> that there may be additional logic added by the Fedora Kernel vs the
>> kernel.org kernel which is what kgdb and the extended kgdb patch set is
>> regression tested with.
>>     
>
> Well, I decided to ignore the Fedora kernel and just build your snapshot
> kernel.  That boots.  Unfortunately I still can't get it to work like
> the old kgdb -- I still can't get the kernel printk output messages
> through kgdb like I used to.  But I need those in order to debug this
> bootup problem I'm having.
>
> I'm currently booting with:
>
>   kgdb8250=ttyS0,115200 kgdbwait kgdbcon=ttyS0,115200
>
> What am I missing to get the printk output to kgdb like I used to?
>
>   
I had a 2.6.30-rc3 already built so I tried it out on that.

I used:

kgdb8250=ttyS0,115200 kgdbcon kgdbwait

And it did seem to work ok, but I hit an extra break point that I didn't
set, so I was going to take a look at that.

Jason.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations 
Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of 
expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry 
leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf 
and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf
_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport

Reply via email to