Hi Wayne,
 
thanks for the great work, I'm looking forward to the release. I have several 
questions about licenses / legal issues:

Is there somewhere an overview of the used libraries / 3rd party software and 
their licenses? (for instance an list, LibreOffice table or similar)
 
Are all individual (library) licenses compatible with the KiCad license (GPL 
2+)?
 
What kind of restrictions do I have to expect when I'm using KiCad for my 
designs?
 
--
 
I'm asking, because I've seen a few examples which are unclear for me:
 
(1) The GPLv3 is not compatible with the GPLv2
 
Quote from the FSF (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html):
"Please note that GPLv3 is not compatible with GPLv2 by itself. However, most 
software released under GPLv2 allows you to use the terms of later versions of 
the GPL as well. When this is the case, you can use the code under GPLv3 to 
make the desired combination. To learn more about compatibility between GNU 
licenses, please see our FAQ."

The push and shove router is covered by the GPLv3+. This means the whole KiCad 
package has to be released under the terms of the GPLv3 license, if you're 
including the P&S-router. 

However, the "About../License" tab shows the following text:

"The complete KiCad EDA Suite is released under the GNU General Public License 
(GPL) version 2 or any later version"
 
(2) License of the embedded stroke font
 
This is a particular problem, because the stroke font is hard coded to the 
KiCad binary. The user has no way to load his own font at run-time.

The font itself is derived from the Hershey font family and the Hershey fonts 
are covered by a special license which includes advertising clauses and is thus 
not compatible with the GPLv2. The author of the font was Vladimir Uryvaev and 
the README.txt (helpers/tools_to_build_newstroke-font) states "Released under 
CC-BY licence". This license is also incompatible with both the Hershey license 
and the GPLv2.

One way to solve this issue could be to write an simple loader for the font, 
this way the font is not part of the program itself and the Hershey font 
license has to be distributed with the KiCad package. And maybe for the distant 
future it makes sense to use a different stroke font like the ISO 3098 font 
from Wikipedia (public domain, 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ISO3098.svg) or Lorenzo's variant.

You can find the Hershey font license here: 
http://ghostscript.com/doc/current/Hershey.htm

The GPL-license itself is not ideal for a font, because if you're embedding the 
font in a design (schematics etc.) the whole work has to be distributed under 
the terms of the GPL-license.
 
(3) The KiCad library license
 
The used GNU Library General Public License is the predecessor of the GNU 
Lesser General Public License. See also:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.0.en.html 
 
What was the motivation for selecting this license? 
 
Does this license offer any advantages over the GPL? 
 
Section 5 states:
 
"[..] However, linking a "work that uses the Library" with the Library creates 
an executable that is a derivative of the Library (because it contains portions 
of the Library), rather than a "work that uses the library". The executable is 
therefore covered by this License. Section 6 states terms for distribution of 
such executables. [..]"

Using a library to create a PCB design is quite similar to linking and creating 
a executable, thus any distributed design falls under section 6 - that means 
you need to "[..] permit modification of the work for the customer's own use 
and reverse engineering [..]" and accompany the work "[..] with the complete 
machine-readable "work that uses the Library", as object code and/or source 
code, so that the user can modify the Library and then relink to produce a 
modified executable containing the modified Library". [..]"
 
Basically this is the same challenge like with any GPL-licensed font. The Free 
Software Foundation published 2005 the so-called "GPL font exception " (see 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_font_exception). The gEDA developers found in 
my opinion a similar and better solution, they have defined a exception clause 
for their library - just like the GPL font exception - so you can use the 
library also for commercial (closed) projects (see 
http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:license).
 
Thanks,
Torsten

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to