>     IRISH NEWS ROUND-UP
>     http://irlnet.com/rmlist/
>     
>     Wednesday/Thursday, 28/29 June, 2000
>     
> 
> 1.  GOVT. BATTLES NO CONFIDENCE VOTE
> 2.  40-day review of Bloody Sunday evidence ends
> 3.  Arsonists strike pub, club
> 4.  Rail line attacked
> 5.  Shoot-to-kill families want answers
> 6.  Over 4,000 complaints against RUC
> 7.  Sligo set to elect Sinn Fein Mayor
> 8.  'Irish people deserve new political dispensation'
> 9.  Analysis: Red card looming for Ahern and Harney
> 10. Events in Ireland and Britain
>  
>  
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  
> >>>>>> GOVT. BATTLES NO CONFIDENCE VOTE
>  
>  
>  The Dublin government is today struggling to hold onto power with
>  its survival dependent on a few independent members of Ireland's
>  lower house, the Dail.
>  
>  Public confidence in Fianna Fail and their junior partner in
>  government, the Progressive Democrats, has fallen to an all-time
>  low following their refusal to consider an alternative to the
>  appointment to a top European job of Hugh O'Flaherty.  A former
>  judge, Mr O'Flaherty resigned following allegations that he
>  improperly interfered in the judicial process.
>  
>  A series of allegations linking members of the current government
>  to the corrupt reign of the former Fianna Fail leader, Charles
>  Haughey, could prove the final undoing of the current government.
>  
>  A by-election last week in South Tipperary saw Fianna Fail beaten
>  into a humiliating third place.
>  
>  The latest blow for Bertie Ahern's coalition government came
>  yesterday at the Moriarty tribunal into political corruption,
>  where it was confirmed that Ahern's Fianna Fail party has failed
>  to disclose crucial information on donations to the party.
>  
>  Mr Ahern and Fianna Fail members emerged from yesterday's
>  tribunal sitting with several key questions unanswered and with
>  their claims that they had co-operated fully with the tribunal
>  undermined. The tribunal is now to investigate whether the party
>  deliberately or inadvertently withheld crucial information. Mr
>  Ahern claimed he had not given the tribunal certain information
>  because he did not think it was relevant.
>  
>  The tribunal will now seek to establish whether Fianna Fail's
>  withholding of key information was deliberate or accidental. The
>  tribunal counsel, Mr John Coughlan, said he was not suggesting
>  "at this stage" that the withholding was deliberate but said
>  "that is a matter to be inquired into" and for Mr Justice
>  Moriarty ultimately to decide.
>  
>  During the lengthy no-confidence debate today -- the last Dail
>  sitting before October 3rd -- attacks on Mr Ahern were renewed in
>  the wake of yesterday's evidence.
>  
>  But the Taoiseach made a defence of the coalition's record in
>  office, concentrating on the government's record on the North. He
>  described the peace process as "the biggest achievement of a
>  generation".
>  
>  The Fine Gael leader, John Bruton, accused Fianna Fail of putting
>  pragmatism before political principle. This pragmatism, he said,
>  had allowed certain business interests to "colonise and corrupt
>  top levels" within Fianna Fail. Fianna Fail, he said, could renew
>  itself, but only from the Opposition benches.
>  
>  Sinn Fein's Caoimhghin o Caolain said the coalition had done
>  nothing to address the "fundamental inequalities which blight our
>  society.
>  
>  "In health, in education, in the workplace, in the desperation of
>  tens of thousands of our people to put a roof over their heads,
>  the inequalities are glaring and the gap between those with
>  excess wealth and those without the basic necessities has grown
>  wider."
>  
>  There was a real opposition in this Dail, he said, but it was not
>  from Fine Gael or Labour. "I have no confidence in them either."
>  
>  He said the "deeply flawed" approach of John Bruton to the peace
>  process meant that his would be "a most undesirable nomination"
>  for the position of Taoiseach. "As for social and economic
>  policies the difference between his party and the Taoiseach's is
>  wafer thin."
>  
>  Facing a clamour for his resignation, Mr Ahern insisted he was
>  determined to see out his term of office until the next election
>  in 2002.   With the no-confidence motion opposed by three or four
>  key independents it is virtually certain that he will at least
>  remain in power over the summer recess. But in the face of the
>  overwhelming flood of sleaze revelations, no-one really believes
>  this government can survive for another two years.
>  
>  
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>  
> >>>>>> 40-day review of Bloody Sunday evidence ends
>  
>  
>  "Not so much an opening as a beginning of the search for the
>  truth of what happened," was how the British QC, Mr Christopher
>  Clarke, described his marathon presentation, which concluded
>  yesterday as the Bloody Sunday inquiry adjourned until the
>  autumn.
>  
>  His review of the evidence gathered so far on the 1972 British
>  massacre of unarmed Derry civilians stretched over more than 40
>  days.
>  
>  It has set the scene for the hearing of direct evidence by
>  hundreds of witnesses about the events of January 30th, 1972 when
>  13 civil rights demonstrators were shot dead by British soldiers
>  and a further 13 were wounded, one of whom died later.
>  
>  The inquiry will resume on September 4th when hearing of oral
>  evidence by witnesses is expected to begin.
>  
>  Spokespersons for the Bloody Sunday Trust, which campaigned for
>  many years on behalf of the families of those killed and wounded
>  to have a new inquiry set up, pointed out yesterday that a great
>  deal of important evidence remained to be completed. Legal
>  representatives of the families have not yet seen, for example,
>  the statements of some 300 soldiers which have not yet been
>  signed or otherwise completed.
>  
>  Mr Liam Wray, whose brother Jim, was among the dead, said the
>  detailed evidence had been quite harrowing at times: "It brings
>  back memories that, to some degree, you've put to the back of
>  your mind because they are horrific."
>  
>  The detail conveyed the reality of what did happen "and what
>  happened was that my brother and other people were murdered on
>  that day and that matter has not been resolved adequately 28
>  years on. I sincerely hope that in the next year or two it will
>  be."
>  
>  MEDIA INFLUENCED
>  
>  The last day of Mr Clarke's presentation saw him reveal how a
>  Britsh newspaper journalist was encouraged to take part in a
>  cover-up of Bloody Sunday.
>  
>  In February 1972, a Sunday Times journalist met a British army
>  public relations officer for drinks at a barracks outside Derry,
>  according to material heard yesterday. At the meeting, a
>  14-year-old boy from the Bogside was produced, who professed to
>  have seen IRA men open fire on Bloody Sunday.  Counsel to the
>  inquiry read part of a secret memorandum from the journalist,
>  Murray Sayle, to the then editor, Harold Evans, and others.
>  
>  It included what counsel described as "a curious passage", from
>  which a name has been blanked out by the tribunal. It says:
>  
>  "Last Monday night, February 14th, I was invited down to Drumahoe
>  barracks just outside Derry for drinks with [blank], PRO officer
>  of the 41 Light Aircraft Regiment . . . "[Blank] shot me an
>  incredible line. He said he had been present at the demonstration
>  himself, dressed in plain clothes and a wig, and had seen the IRA
>  open up with Thompsons near the barricade site, thus killing
>  their own people. One body, he said, had a .303 bullet in it,
>  proving that the IRA had shot, because they have .303s stolen
>  from the British army barracks; so, I pointed out, have the
>  marksmen on the sniper posts around the Bogside.
>  
>  "He produced a boy of 14 who said he was from the Bogside and
>  said he had seen the IRA men open up with Thompsons and
>  nail-bombs. I asked him (the boy) was he sure about the
>  nailbombs. He said: `Yes'.
>  
>  "Ten minutes before, [blank] said he had heard no nail-bombs and
>  not one witness had heard any nail-bombs.
>  
>  "Then, getting deeper and dee per into the whisky, (blank said):
>  `You know, old boy, there is only one thing we really want here,
>  we just cannot let people at home think we shot unarmed men in
>  the back, we just cannot have people thinking that, can we?"
>  
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> >>>>>> Arsonists strike pub, club
>  
>  
>  Loyalists carried out arson attacks on a north Belfast bar and on
>  a County Derry Gaelic sports club within the past two days.
>  
>  The Circus bar on the Antrim Road, at the junction of Carlisle
>  Circus, was gutted in the early morning blaze on Wednesday.
>  
>  The arson attack has been linked to a dispute over the removal of
>  dozens of loyalist paramilitary flags which were erected as part
>  of a territorial feud among loyalists in Belfast.
>  
>  The so-called "Ulster Freedom Fighters" had threatened business 
>  owners in the area, warning them "further action" would be taken 
>  if the flags were removed.
>  
>  Up to 30 firefighters battled for over two hours to bring the
>  pub blaze under control.
>  
>  The building's roof was completely destroyed and the first and
>  second floors, which were rented out as office accommodation,
>  extensively damaged. Damage is estimated to run into hundreds of
>  thousands of pounds.
>  
>  Sinn Fein assembly member Gerry Kelly last night urged
>  nationalists to be vigilant, especially in north Belfast.
>  
>  Meanwhile, extensive damage was caused when flamable liquid
>  exploded at St Oliver Plunkett's GAA club in the village of Clady
>  on Tuesday, one of County Derry's foremost GAA facilities.
>  
>  Last night Sinn Fein councillor for the area, Margaret McKenna
>  said it was a clear attack on the GAA.
>  
>  "It must be taken in the context of the attempted bombing of GAA
>  facilities at Magherafelt and the murder of [GAA offical] Sean 
>  Browne in Bellaghy," she said.
>  
>  
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  
> >>>>>> Rail line attacked
>  
>  
>  A device detonated today near the main Belfast-Dublin rail line
>  outside Newry in South Armagh.
>  
>  This was the first time the Belfast-Dublin rail line has been
>  attacked by a dissident micro-group.
>  
>  There were no reports of anybody being hurt by the explosion, and
>  there was no claim of the group responsible.
>  
>  A bomb alert north of Newry in Banbridge turned out to be a hoax.
>  A number of residents were evacuated from their homes after a
>  suspect device was found outside a house.
>  
>  The RUC Chief Constable, Ronnie Flanagan said he believed that
>  the so-called "Real IRA" was responsible for the South Armagh
>  blast near Meigh, which caused minor damage to the rail track.
>  
>  Flanagan also said today that he also had some evidence that
>  dissident Loyalists were planning to cause trouble at Orange
>  parades such as Drumcree, but did not elaborate.
>  
>  
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> >>>>>> Shoot-to-kill families want answers
>  
>  
>  The families of three unarmed IRA Volunteers shot dead by the
>  British SAS in disputed circumstances in 1978 are calling for the
>  full facts to be acknowledged by the British government. "We only
>  want the truth," said Margaret Brown, mother of Volunteer Dennis
>  Brown.
>  
>  Speaking at a Belfast press conference, the mothers of two of the
>  dead described the day their sons were killed. Dennis Brown,
>  Jackie Mailey and Jim Mulvenna were all young men in their
>  twenties; all three had young children of their own. A fourth
>  man, William Hanna (26), a Protestant passer by on his way home
>  with a friend, was also killed.
>  
>  All four unarmed men were shot dead by an SAS assassination squad
>  which had staked out an unoccupied post office depot in North
>  Belfast and waited for their victims to walk into the killing
>  zone.
>  
>  The SAS had been tipped off by an informer that a four-man IRA
>  unit planned to firebomb Ballysillan depot. Over 170 shots,
>  without warning, were fired by the ambush team of five SAS
>  soldiers and an RUC officer. One man was repeatedly shot by two
>  soldiers as he lay seriously injured on the ground.
>  
>  In the ensuing cover up, the British Army initially claimed there
>  had been an exchange of fire but no weapons were recovered at the
>  scene. There was no forensic evidence to suggest that the men had
>  even handled weapons and the inquest accepted that the dead men
>  had been unarmed.
>  
>  British Army claims that warnings were given by the team before
>  opening fire were dismissed by civilian eye witnesses, including
>  a companion of the civilian killed during the SAS operation.
>  
>  Demonisation of the dead men in the British media attempted to
>  obscure the lies told by the British Army and authorities. At
>  inquest, the SAS team changed their story, and claimed they'd
>  returned fire after they "thought" they were being fired at.
>  
>  In the words of Monsignor Raymond Murray, their statements were
>  "well spiced with imaginary firing from phantom gunmen, shouts of
>  warnings and escaping men in 'firing positions' and seemingly
>  'carrying a handgun'.
>  
>  Fr. Murray described the ambush as a "terrible atrocity". The
>  British had "got away with it" by peddling the myth that three of
>  the men somehow "deserved to die". At the time of the shooting,
>  British military sources leaked spurious stories to the media.
>  
>  The Daily Mail headline the morning after the killings claimed
>  that the dead men were "suspects" in the La Mon bombing. "Depot
>  bombers carried Napalm" claimed the tabloid press.
>  
>  A call for an inquiry into the SAS killings by the Hanna family
>  in 1978 was rejected out of hand by the then British Secretary of
>  State, Roy Mason. For over two decades, relatives of the deceased
>  have sought to establish the truth about the death of their loved
>  ones.
>  
>  Until recently, repeated requests by family members for a copy of
>  the inquest documents had been refused, but earlier this year
>  papers were handed over to a solicitor acting on behalf of the
>  families.
>  
>  Outside of the obvious prevarication in the statements of the SAS
>  and RUC personnel involved in the killings, the inquest documents
>  raise serious doubts about the British Army operation.
>  
>  Premeditated and pre-planned killings contravene Article 2 of the
>  European Convention on Human Rights, the right to life, a
>  spokesperson for the families and sister of Dennis Brown,
>  Geraldine Keenan, told the conference.
>  
>  "This convention provides for the right to life and a right to a
>  fair trial. Both rights were blatantly denied to those killed.
>  The SAS were determined that no prisoners were to be taken alive
>  that night.
>  
>  "Those who denied these fundamental rights are the same people
>  who condemn terrorism and claim a moral superiority in the
>  conflict of the last thirty years. That particular lie was
>  exposed in the Ballysillan massacre. We are determined to expose
>  the other lies and falsehoods that the British government have
>  encouraged to distort the facts of this case," she said.
>  
>  The families went on to describe the "double burden endured all
>  these years." Not only were their loved ones killed without mercy
>  but the authorities then treated their grieving relatives with
>  contempt.
>  
>  "For hours our loved ones lay dead in the street. We were not
>  informed about their deaths until morning," said Geraldine.
>  Identifying the bodies was a harrowing ordeal made a great deal
>  worse by the attitude of the RUC.
>  
>  Kathleen Magee went to identify her partner, Jim Mulvenna. She
>  innocently asked her father, who had accompanied her to the
>  morgue, why Jim's body was wet. An RUC man standing close by
>  overheard the question and gleefully said: "Wouldn't you be wet
>  if you were lying out in the rain all night."
>  
>  "A few months after the killing a man,claiming to be a witness to
>  the shooting called into Ardoyne chapel," said Geraldine. "He
>  claimed that he heard the men surrender,  he had seen murder
>  committed, and his mind had been disturbed by what he had
>  witnessed."
>  
>  "The British described those they killed as "terrorists" but to
>  us they were husbands, fathers, sons, brothers, uncles. They were
>  not faceless men. They were popular individuals in this
>  community. They were proud IRA Volunteers."
>  
>  The families are calling for any witnesses to come forward. "They
>  were human beings with human rights," said Geraldine. " They did
>  not deserve to die as they did."
>  
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> c.  RM Distribution and others.  Articles may be reprinted with credit.
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Reply via email to