This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
Alex On 18.07.2013, at 15:19, Bharat Bhushan wrote: > Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhus...@freescale.com> > --- > v2: > - No change > arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h > index c2e5e98..277cb18 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *to_e500(struct > kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > #define E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_UX|MAS3_UR|MAS3_UW) > #define E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK (MAS3_SX|MAS3_SR|MAS3_SW) > #define MAS2_ATTRIB_MASK \ > - (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1) > + (MAS2_X0 | MAS2_X1 | MAS2_E) > #define MAS3_ATTRIB_MASK \ > (MAS3_U0 | MAS3_U1 | MAS3_U2 | MAS3_U3 \ > | E500_TLB_USER_PERM_MASK | E500_TLB_SUPER_PERM_MASK) > -- > 1.7.0.4 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
