Gleb Natapov wrote:
Forget to remove debug output before submitting. Resending.

Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
index 1ccb50c..d32ceac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
@@ -218,6 +218,11 @@ int kvm_pic_read_irq(struct kvm *kvm)
        struct kvm_pic *s = pic_irqchip(kvm);
pic_lock(s);
+       if (!s->output) {
+               pic_unlock(s);
+               return -1;
+       }
+       s->output = 0;
        irq = pic_get_irq(&s->pics[0]);
        if (irq >= 0) {
                pic_intack(&s->pics[0], irq);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
index 96dfbb6..e93405a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ int kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
        if (vector == -1) {
                if (kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(v)) {
                        s = pic_irqchip(v->kvm);
-                       s->output = 0;               /* PIC */
                        vector = kvm_pic_read_irq(v->kvm);
                }
        }

Please split into a different patch. Even though it is a lot simpler, it contains non-local changes and is therefore relatively dangerous.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 44e87a5..854e8c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3174,10 +3174,10 @@ static void inject_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
                        vcpu->arch.nmi_injected = true;
                        kvm_x86_ops->set_nmi(vcpu);
                }
-       } else if (kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu)) {
-               if (kvm_x86_ops->interrupt_allowed(vcpu)) {
-                       kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu),
-                                           false);
+       } else if (kvm_x86_ops->interrupt_allowed(vcpu)) {
+               int vec = kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu);
+               if (vec != -1) {
+                       kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, vec, false);
                        kvm_x86_ops->set_irq(vcpu);
                }
        }

Again, I don't think this is a win. Usually ->interrupts_allowed() == true so we'll execute the rest anyway.

Perhaps we could move the call to has_interrupt into get_interrupt.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to