On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:13:02 pm Shirley Ma wrote: > Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma <x...@us.ibm.com>
I don't think there's a good way of splitting this change across multiple patches. And I don't think this patch will compile; I don't think we can get rid of trim_pages yet. We *could* first split the receive paths into multiple parts as you have (eg. add_recvbuf_big etc), then actually rewrite them, but that's too much work to refactor the code twice. So just roll all the driver changes into one patch; so you will have two patches: one which creates the destroy_bufs API for virtio, and one which uses it in the virtio_net driver. > +static struct sk_buff *skb_goodcopy(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct page > **page, > + unsigned int *len) This actually allocates an skb, and transfers the first page to it (via copy and possibly the first fragment). skb_from_page() perhaps? > + hdr_len = sizeof(hdr->hdr); > + offset = sizeof(struct padded_vnet_hdr); > + } > + > + memcpy(hdr, p, hdr_len); > + > + *len -= hdr_len; Perhaps you should return NULL here as an error if *len was < hdr_len? Thanks, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
