On 03/22/2010 06:08 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Avi Kivity<a...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 03/22/2010 04:32 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Avi Kivity<a...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 03/22/2010 02:44 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
This is why i consider that line of argument rather dishonest ...
I am not going to reply to any more email from you on this thread.
Because i pointed out that i consider a line of argument intellectually
dishonest?
I did not say _you_ as a person are dishonest - doing that would be an ad
honimen attack against your person. (In fact i dont think you are, to the
contrary)
An argument can certainly be labeled dishonest in a fair discussion and it
is not a personal attack against you to express my opinion about that.
Sigh, why am I drawn into this.
A person who uses dishonest arguments is a dishonest person. [...]
That's not how i understood that phrase - and i did not mean to suggest that
you are dishonest and i do not think that you are dishonest (to the contrary).
Word games.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
