On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:07 +0200, "Avi Kivity" <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/14/2010 12:54 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > On 10/13/2010 05:32 PM, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> What's the motivation for such a huge number of interfaces? Ultimately to bring multiple 10Gb bonds into a Vyatta guest. --- > BTW, I don't think it's possible to hot-add physical functions. I > believe I know of a card that supports dynamic add of physical functions > (pre-dating SR-IOV) I don't know what you're talking about, but it seems you have a better handle than I on this VT-c stuff, so perhaps misguidedly I'll direct my next question to you. Is additional configuration required to make use of SR-IOV & VTq? I don't immediateley understand how the queueing knows who is who in the absense of eth.vlan- or if I need to for that matter. My hope is that this is something like plug n play as long as kernel, host & driver versions are >foo, but I haven't yet found documentation to confirm it. For the sake of future queries, I've come across these references so far: http://download.intel.com/design/network/applnots/321211.pdf http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/6/6a/KvmForum2008%24kdf2008_7.pdf http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg27860.html http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg22721.html http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/38508 http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=36918 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
