On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:34:24PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-03-02 11:56, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:22:35AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2011-03-01 13:58, Alon Levy wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:11:26PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>> On 2011-02-27 20:03, Alon Levy wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2011-02-26 12:43, xming wrote:
> >>>>>>> When trying to start X (and it loads qxl driver) the kvm process just 
> >>>>>>> crashes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is fixed by Gerd's attached patch (taken from rhel repository, 
> >>>>> don't know
> >>>>> why it wasn't pushed to qemu-kvm upstream). I'll send it to kvm list as 
> >>>>> well (separate email).
> >>>>
> >>>> Patch looks OK on first glance, but the changelog is misleading: This
> >>>> was broken for _both_ trees, but upstream didn't detect the bug.
> >>>
> >>> So I didn't test with qemu not having this patch, but according to the 
> >>> discussion in the
> >>> launchpad bug the problem only happens with qemu-kvm. This doesn't rule 
> >>> out it being a
> >>> bug, perhaps it is just triggered much less frequently I guess.
> >>
> >> Again: qemu-kvm has the instrumentation to detect the bug, qemu is
> >> lacking this, but both trees will break subtly if cpu_current_env is not
> >> properly restored.
> > 
> > ok, so what do you want to be done further before this patch is applied?
> 
> The patch posted to qemu-devel just requires a changelog that correctly
> reflects what it addresses (and where).

Just sent,

Alon

> 
> Jan
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to