> * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com> [2011-04-01 16:56:57]: > > > Hi > > > > > > 1) zone reclaim doesn't work if the system has multiple node and the > > > > workload is file cache oriented (eg file server, web server, mail > > > > server, et al). > > > > because zone recliam make some much free pages than zone->pages_min > > > > and > > > > then new page cache request consume nearest node memory and then it > > > > bring next zone reclaim. Then, memory utilization is reduced and > > > > unnecessary LRU discard is increased dramatically. > > > > > > > > SGI folks added CPUSET specific solution in past. > > > > (cpuset.memory_spread_page) > > > > But global recliam still have its issue. zone recliam is HPC > > > > workload specific > > > > feature and HPC folks has no motivation to don't use CPUSET. > > > > > > I am afraid you misread the patches and the intent. The intent to > > > explictly enable control of unmapped pages and has nothing > > > specifically to do with multiple nodes at this point. The control is > > > system wide and carefully enabled by the administrator. > > > > Hm. OK, I may misread. > > Can you please explain the reason why de-duplication feature need to > > selectable and > > disabled by defaut. "explicity enable" mean this feature want to spot > > corner case issue?? > > Yes, because given a selection of choices (including what you > mentioned in the review), it would be nice to have > this selectable.
It's no good answer. :-/ Who need the feature and who shouldn't use it? It this enough valuable for enough large people? That's my question point. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
