From: "Alex,Shi" <alex....@intel.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:45:33 +0800
>> >>>> percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them >> >>>> for further code clean up. >> >>>> >> >>>> And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better >> >>>> performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable() >> >>>> >> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex....@intel.com> >> >>>> --- >> >>>> net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c | 12 ++++++------ >> >>>> net/socket.c | 4 ++-- >> >>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >>> >> >>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> >>> Thanks ! >> >> >> >> Anyone like to pick up this patch? or more comments for this? >> > >> > Kaber, David: >> > I appreciate for your any comments on this. Could you like do me a >> > favor? >> >> No objections from me. > > rend this patch for 3.2.0 kernel with Eric's Ack. > > David, do you have any concerns for this patch? I will very appreciate > if it can met 3.3 open window. Please just submit it directly with the other this_cpu() patches: Acked-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
