Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de> wrote on 07/06/2012 14:54:35:
> > Well, depends if you re-allocate the vector used by the guest or the vector > > used by the host. Anyway, I think we understand each other :) > > KVM is just a subsystem of the Linux kernel, usually not involved in > LAPIC vector allocations. Your suggestion would turn this around a bit. :) I think we will find long discussions around this type of statement since KVM was created... how many changes made to the Linux kernel were driven by KVM ? (e.g MMU notifies for guest memory swapping) I wrote this just to clarify my point of view. I don't want to start an endless discussion around Linux and KVM synergy, so let's not do that :) > Not impossible, but expect some discussions. ;) Agree -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
