On 07/09/2012 09:20 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Noting pause loop exited vcpu helps in filtering right candidate to yield.
> Yielding to same vcpu may result in more wastage of cpu.
> 
>  
>  struct kvm_lpage_info {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index f75af40..a492f5d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -3264,6 +3264,7 @@ static int interrupt_window_interception(struct 
> vcpu_svm *svm)
>  
>  static int pause_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  {
> +     svm->vcpu.arch.plo.pause_loop_exited = true;
>       kvm_vcpu_on_spin(&(svm->vcpu));
>       return 1;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 32eb588..600fb3c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -4945,6 +4945,7 @@ out:
>  static int handle_pause(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>       skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> +     vcpu->arch.plo.pause_loop_exited = true;
>       kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu);
>  

This code is duplicated.  Should we move it to kvm_vcpu_on_spin?

That means the .plo structure needs to be in common code, but that's not
too bad perhaps.

> index be6d549..07dbd14 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -5331,7 +5331,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>       if (req_immediate_exit)
>               smp_send_reschedule(vcpu->cpu);
> -
> +     vcpu->arch.plo.pause_loop_exited = false;

This adds some tiny overhead to vcpu entry.  You could remove it by
using the vcpu->requests mechanism to clear the flag, since
vcpu->requests is already checked on every entry.

>       kvm_guest_enter();
>  

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to