On 10/29/2012 04:07 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Also we do not update last boosted vcpu in failure cases.
> 
>  #endif
> +
>  void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
>  {
>       struct kvm *kvm = me->kvm;
> @@ -1727,11 +1727,12 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
>                               continue;
>                       if (!kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_directed_yield(vcpu))
>                               continue;
> -                     if (kvm_vcpu_yield_to(vcpu)) {
> +
> +                     yielded = kvm_vcpu_yield_to(vcpu);
> +                     if (yielded > 0)
>                               kvm->last_boosted_vcpu = i;
> -                             yielded = 1;
> +                     if (yielded)
>                               break;
> -                     }
>               }

If yielded == -ESRCH, should we not try to yield to another vcpu?


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to