On 09/04/16 03:29, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hello Shanker,
On 04/04/2016 06:37 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
+static int __init gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc(struct
acpi_subtable_header *header,
+ const unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc =
+ (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header;
+ int maint_irq_mode;
+ static int first_madt = true;
+
+ maint_irq_mode = (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_VGIC_IRQ_MODE) ?
+ ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE : ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;
+
Do you think GICC parameters are valid for an unusable processor?
Good point. We don't know if the value will be valid when the processor
is unusable.
If not we need a validation check here, some thing like this to skip
GICC subtable entry.
if (!(gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED))
return 0;
I will add this check.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
