On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Derick Eddington <derick.edding...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, if they're specific to MzScheme, they're probably not going to > work in Larceny, at least not without reviewing and tweaking some > things. Oh, now I'm remembering your sweet macros, I'm guessing > those .mzscheme.sls are for explicit phasing systems but otherwise > they're not implementation-specific?
Yes, or at least they should be (see later). > Larceny doesn't support implicit main files. I thought so. > Eduardo told you where they're at, but they're not exactly the same as > other implementations'. See my (xitomatl common) library's .larceny.sls > file for what I've done to get a uniform interface. Ah, I had an old version of xitomatl were common.larceny.sls was missing. >From your code it seems that Larceny's format is unsuitable and I need SRFI 48 to get a format compatible with the other implementations. Is that right? It seems anyway that sweet-macros do not work out of the box with Larceny (some error "Too many ...'s"). I will try to nail the issue down to a simple test case. Michele S. _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list Larceny-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
